Rischio
Empieza gratis

DocumentaciónPilotes

Alcance por norma

Lo que Rischio calcula de pilotes y pilas con AASHTO LRFD, 10.ª edición, artículo por artículo: cada chequeo y método, si se calcula, en parte o no.

Cada chequeo y cada método que la norma le pide al pilote, en el orden de la norma, y si Rischio lo calcula. La lista sale del propio motor, así que cambia con cada versión. Los títulos son los de AASHTO, en inglés.

AASHTO LRFD, 10th edition

ArtículoLo que pide la normaRischio
3.4.1, Table 3.4.1-1Strength I
3.4.1, Table 3.4.1-1Strength II, III, V (and IV not for substructures)
3.4.1, Table 3.4.1-1Service I: all loads 1.00
3.4.1, Table 3.4.1-1Extreme Event I: γp 1.00, γEQ project-specific
3.4.1, Table 3.4.1-1Extreme Event II: check flood, collision, ice
10.7.1.6.1, 10.8.1.6.1

Individual pile loads from the cap (Section 4)

Se calcula
10.7.3Strength limit state (driven)
10.7.3.8, Table 10.5.5.2.3-1

Factored axial compression resistance of a single pile ≥ factored load

Se calcula
10.7.3.3

Pile length estimate for the contract from static analysis

En parte
10.7.3.8.6a

Static analysis: RR = φstat Rp + φstat Rs

Se calcula
10.7.3.8.6b

Side in clay, α-method (Tomlinson): φ 0.35

Se calcula
10.7.3.8.6c

Side, β-method (Esrig and Kirby, Fig. 10.7.3.8.6c-1): φ 0.25

No se calcula
10.7.3.8.6d

Side in clay, λ-method (Vijayvergiya and Focht): φ 0.40

No se calcula
10.7.3.8.6e

Tip in clay, qp = 9 Su

Se calcula
10.7.3.8.6f

Side in sand, Nordlund/Thurman: φ 0.45

Se calcula
10.7.3.8.6f

Tip in sand, Nordlund/Thurman: qp = αt N′q σ′v ≤ qL, σ′v ≤ 3.2 ksf

Se calcula
10.7.3.8.6g

SPT method (Meyerhof) in sands and nonplastic silts: φ 0.30

No se calcula
10.7.3.8.6g

CPT method (Nottingham and Schmertmann) in sands and nonplastic silts: φ 0.50

No se calcula
10.7.3.2.2, Table 10.5.5.2.3-1

End bearing in (soft) rock, Canadian Geotech. Society (1985): φ 0.45

No se calcula
10.7.3.2.3

Point bearing on hard rock: limited by structural resistance (6.9.4.1, severe driving φ)

Se calcula
10.7.3.9

Pile group resistance in compression

Se calcula
10.7.3.9, Table 10.5.5.2.3-1

In clay: lesser of the sum and the equivalent pier (block), φb1 0.60

Se calcula
10.7.3.9

In sand: the sum, η = 1.0 at 2.5D or more

Se calcula
10.7.3.9, 10.6.3.1.2a

Strong over weak: group punching on the notional footing

No se calcula
10.7.3.10, Table 10.5.5.2.3-1

Uplift of a single pile: RR = φup Rs

Se calcula
10.7.3.11, Table 10.5.5.2.3-1

Uplift of a pile group: lesser of the sum (φup) and the block (φug 0.50)

En parte
10.7.3.12

Nominal lateral resistance: factored loads, p-y unfactored, φ 1.0

Se calcula
10.7.3.12

p-y curves for the site's soils

Se calcula
10.7.3.12

Lateral resistance of an embedded cap

No se calcula
10.7.3.12, 10.7.6

Minimum penetration for fixity, factored loads, soil φ 1.0

No se calcula
10.7.3.13

Pile structural resistance

En parte
10.7.3.13.1 to .3; 6.5.4.2

Axial compression: steel 6.9.4.1/6.9.5.1 (φc 0.60 H, 0.70 pipe), concrete 5.6.4.4, timber 8.8.2

En parte
C10.7.3.12; 6.5.4.2, 5.5.4.2, 8.5.2.2

Combined axial and flexure under the factored lateral run

En parte
10.7.3.13.4

Buckling: unsupported length plus depth to fixity

En parte
6.10.9.2, 6.12.1.2.3; 6.5.4.2

Shear of a steel pile: the web (or the flanges about the weak axis, k 1.2), a tube by 6.12.1.2.3b; φv 1.00

En parte
10.7.3.7, 10.7.1.6.2

Drag load: DR = 0 at geotechnical strength; structural with drag where the toe can't move

En parte
10.7.3.1

Overall stability through embankments, on slopes, with scour, inclined strata

No se calcula
10.7.6

Minimum penetration: the deepest of settlement, deflection, uplift, drag, scour, fixity

No se calcula
10.7.2Service limit state (driven)
10.7.2.3.1

Group settlement on an equivalent footing at or below the neutral plane

Se calcula
10.7.2.3.2

Cohesive soil: shallow foundation settlement procedures

En parte
10.7.2.3.2

Cohesionless: Meyerhof's SPT, ρ = q I √B / N160

No se calcula
10.7.2.3.2

Cohesionless: Meyerhof's CPT, ρ = q B I / 2qc

No se calcula
10.7.2.3.2, 10.6.2.4.2

Cohesionless: Hough on the equivalent footing

Se calcula
10.7.2.3

Settlement of a single pile

No se calcula
10.7.2.4

Horizontal movement by soil-structure interaction, Service I

Se calcula
10.7.2.5, 10.7.1.6.2, 3.11.8

Downdrag: neutral plane method, elastic compression and settlement with drag

En parte
10.7.4, 10.5.5.3Extreme event limit state (driven)
10.7.4

Lateral spreading force

No se calcula
10.7.1.4

Batter piles

No se calcula
10.8.3Strength limit state (shafts)
10.8.3.5, Table 10.5.5.2.4-1

Axial compression: RR = φqp Rp + φqs Rs

Se calcula
10.8.3.5.1b

Side in clay, α-method (Brown et al. 2010): φ 0.45

Se calcula
10.8.3.5.1c

Tip in clay: Nc Su ≤ 80 ksf, Nc = 6(1 + 0.2Z/D) ≤ 9: φ 0.40

Se calcula
10.8.3.5.1b, 10.8.3.9.7

Belled shaft in compression: no side on the bell's periphery; the tip on the bell, its base ≤ 3D

No se calcula
10.8.3.5.1a

Cohesive soil also by effective stress, for drained loading

No se calcula
10.8.3.5.2b

Side in sand, β = (1 − sin φ′f)(σ′p/σ′v)^sin φ′f tan φ′f: φ 0.55

Se calcula
10.8.3.5.2b

φ′f = 27.5 + 9.2 log (N1)60

En parte
10.8.3.5.2b

σ′p from N60: 0.47 N60^m pa (sand), 0.15 N60 pa (gravel)

Se calcula
10.8.3.5.2c

Tip in sand: qp = 1.2 N60 for N60 ≤ 50, ≤ 60 ksf: φ 0.50

Se calcula
10.8.3.5.3

Strong over weaker soil within 1.5B of the tip: tip reduced linearly

Se calcula
10.8.3.5.4b

Rock side: qs = C pa √(qu/pa), qu ≤ f′c; fractured 0.65 αE: φ 0.55 (Carter and Kulhawy 0.50)

Se calcula
10.8.3.5.4c

Rock tip: 2.5 qu intact; Hoek–Brown in jointed rock: φ 0.50

Se calcula
10.8.3.5.4d

Side and tip combined by their mobilizing movements

Se calcula
10.8.3.5.5, Table 10.5.5.2.4-1

Cohesive IGM (Su 5 to 50 ksf): side φ 0.60, tip 0.55

En parte
10.8.3.6

Shaft group resistance: group effects evaluated

Se calcula
10.8.3.6.2

Cohesive: 10.7.3.9 applies; block φb1 0.55, cap in contact or not

Se calcula
10.8.3.6.4

Strong over soft cohesive: block bearing by 10.7.3.9

No se calcula
10.8.3.7.2, Table 10.5.5.2.4-1

Uplift of a single shaft: side as in compression, φup clay 0.35, sand 0.45, rock 0.40

Se calcula
10.8.3.7.2

Belled shaft in clay: qsbell = Nu Su, Nu 0 to 8

No se calcula
10.8.3.7.3, 10.7.3.11

Group uplift: φug 0.45

Se calcula
10.8.3.8, 10.7.3.12

Horizontal resistance: as 10.7.3.12; head fixed into the cap in groups

Se calcula
10.8.3.9

Structural resistance as reinforced concrete (Section 5)

Se calcula
10.8.3.9.1; 5.6.4.4

Axial compression: Pn = 0.85 Po with spirals or hoops, 0.80 with ties; φ 0.75

Se calcula
10.8.3.9.1; 5.6.2.1, 5.6.2.2, 5.6.4.5, 5.5.4.2

Axial load and flexure by strain compatibility, φ 0.75 to 0.90 by the net tensile strain

Se calcula
10.8.3.9.1; 5.7.3.3, 5.7.2.8, 5.7.3.4

Shear: Vc + Vs ≤ 0.25 f′c bv dv, bv = D, dv = 0.9 (D/2 + Dr/π); φv 0.90

Se calcula
10.8.3.9.2 → 10.7.3.13.4; 5.6.4.3

Buckling and lateral stability: slenderness by a second-order analysis

Se calcula
10.8.3.9.3, 10.8.3.9.4; 5.6.4.2, 5.6.4.6, 5.7.2.5

Reinforcement: longitudinal limits, spiral ratio, minimum transverse steel, extent below fixity

Se calcula
10.8.3.4, 10.8.1.6.2

Drag load: structural strength and extreme event; also service if tipped in soil

En parte
10.8.2Service limit state (shafts)
10.8.2.2.2

Single shaft settlement: load transfer + consolidation below the tip + axial compression

En parte
10.8.2.2.2

Normalized load–settlement curves limit the nominal resistance to the tolerable movement

Se calcula
10.8.2.2.3

IGM settlement (Brown et al. 2010)

No se calcula
10.8.2.2.4

Group settlement by 10.7.2.3, two shafts or more

Se calcula
10.8.2.3

Horizontal movement; rock sockets by rock mass, brittle above 0.0004b

En parte
10.8.2.4, 10.7.2.5

Downdrag

En parte
10.8.4, 10.5.5.3, 10.7.4Extreme event limit state (shafts): φ 1.0, uplift ≤ 0.80

Escribe para buscar: un método, una advertencia, un campo…

↑↓ para moverte · ↵ para abrir · esc para cerrar