Example 17.1 · Cantilever wall
Example 17.1 of Das & Sivakugan (2017), Principles of Foundation Engineering, solved in Rischio and compared with the source's answers.
- Source
- Das, B. M., & Sivakugan, N. (2017). Principles of Foundation Engineering, SI edition, 9th ed. Cengage Learning. Example 17.1.
- ID
das-pfe9-17-1
Open in the studioA copy, in your account
Source vs Rischio
| Source | Rischio | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overturning | 2.98 | 2.98 | 0.0 % |
| Sliding | 2.73 | 2.73 | −0.1 % |
| Bearing capacity | 3.0 | 2.93 | −2.3 % |
The book takes the depth factors for Df/B > 1, though here Df/B < 1, and seems to use B′ for B in them.
Every check
What the engine checks in this model, against Rischio's default limits.
| OverturningPasses | Passes | ||
| SlidingPasses | Passes | ||
| Bearing capacityFails | Fails | ||
| EccentricityPasses | Passes |
The model
The example's data, element by element, as the model holds it.
WallWall
- Unit weight
- 23.58 kN/m³
- Embedment depth
- 1.5 m
StemWall element · Trapezoid
- Position from the toe
- 0.7 m
- Height
- 6 m
- Bottom width
- 0.7 m
- Top width
- 0.5 m
- Back face batter
- 0 °
BaseWall element · Rectangle
- Position from the toe
- 0 m
- Height
- 0.7 m
- Width
- 4 m
Ground surfaceBackfill
- Backfill slope
- 10 °
BackfillBackfill stratum
- Thickness
- 6.7 m
- Unit weight
- 18 kN/m³
- Cohesion
- 0 kPa
- Friction angle
- 30 °
Foundation soilFoundation stratum
- Unit weight
- 19 kN/m³
- Saturated unit weight
- 20 kN/m³
- Cohesion
- 40 kPa
- Friction angle
- 20 °